- Judge transportation plus recurring fees, not the headline discount percentage.
- Keep the delivery standard and shipment inputs consistent throughout the test.
- Use a balanced sample of recent orders, not one unusually favorable package.
- Verify changes with a pilot and the final invoice.
The right answer in a ShipForce vs The Shipping Savers decision depends on shipment mix, workflow and the final charge after fees. A business should test both options against its own recent orders rather than rely on a single sample label.
The data matters more than the headline discount. A review should include enough weeks to capture normal volume, common destinations, different carton sizes and any recurring accessorials. That creates a dependable baseline for evaluating ShipForce vs the shipping savers.
How to make a fair ShipForce vs The Shipping Savers comparison
The test should cover eligible carrier pricing, workflow and shipment-level testing. A single light package to one ZIP code cannot represent an entire shipping operation.
- Record the ZIP-code pairs in the sample so lane and zone effects are visible in the comparison.
- Track finished package weight against billed weight for every package in the sample.
- Confirm the real arrival commitment and ship-day cutoff before comparing prices.
- Identify residential and delivery-area exposure plus handling fees instead of hiding them inside an average.
- Add fuel, demand and invoice-adjustment fees when building the comparison baseline.
- The workflow and support differences that matter to the business after comparing ShipForce and The Shipping Savers.
The comparison should not assume that ShipForce and The Shipping Savers are interchangeable. Document the services, workflow steps and support requirements that matter, then price the same shipments. The result may differ by package size, destination, service and monthly volume.
If one option looks lower, inspect why. Confirm that the service commitment matches, that residential and delivery-area status are handled consistently, and that the number includes fees likely to appear on the invoice.
A controlled way to compare the options
Good testing removes avoidable variables so the team can tell whether the recommendation—not luck—changed the result.
- Build a cross-section of recent orders that covers common cartons, zones, services and both commercial and residential destinations.
- Keep the ship date, addresses, weight, dimensions and package type constant so the comparison is a fair test.
- Break out the transportation charge and every added line separately.
- Mark every service change; a lower price is not a valid win when the arrival promise is worse.
- Use a controlled shipment group first, then compare expected and invoiced charges before expanding the change.
A documented comparison gives finance, operations and customer service one shared view of cost, workflow and customer impact.
Illustrative shipment review
Consider a business shipping about 800 packages per month. One representative package moves from Portland, ME to Philadelphia, PA, weighs 8 lb and measures 22 x 18 x 14 inches. The numbers below are only a teaching example, not a carrier quote.
| Cost component | Current example | Reviewed example |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | $47.00 | $35.50 |
| Fuel and accessorials | $17.99 | $8.39 |
| Illustrative total | $64.99 | $45.49 |
The reviewed example could come from a better eligible rate, a smaller billed size, a different service that still meets the deadline, fewer accessorials or a combination of those changes. This step also makes internal conversations easier. Finance can see the complete cost, operations can see the process change, and customer service can confirm that the delivery promise remains intact.
Where a business should look for savings
Use identical inputs
Price the same packages in ShipForce and The Shipping Savers with matching addresses, dimensions and service commitments.
Compare all-in cost
Include fuel, residential, delivery-area, handling and platform costs instead of recording only the first number shown.
Measure workflow
Record the time needed to import orders, correct addresses, choose services, print labels and resolve problems.
Pilot before moving volume
Test a representative group, verify invoices and keep a rollback plan before changing the full operation.
Use dollars per package as the primary measure; convert to annual impact after the test covers representative volume.
What to gather before requesting a review
Before pricing, assemble the details below so the result can be checked package by package:
- At least four representative weeks of shipment history.
- Origin and destination ZIP codes for every shipment.
- Carrier service, ship date and delivery commitment.
- Actual weight, package dimensions and billed weight.
- Transportation charge, fuel and every accessorial line.
- Residential and delivery-area indicators, together with package quantity.
- Credits, adjustments, voids and claims where available.
- A set of identical test shipments priced in both ShipForce and The Shipping Savers.
- A short record of workflow time, support needs and any additional platform cost.
A practical 30-day action plan
Build the comparison baseline from recent shipment exports and invoices, grouped by service, billed weight and destination type.
Rank the recurring cost drivers in the comparison and separate pricing issues from packaging, address or routing problems.
Apply the recommendation to a controlled group and preserve the same practical delivery requirement.
Compare expected and final charges, verify service performance, then write the operating rule for the team.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Comparing prices across different delivery standards and ignoring the service change.
- Pricing from estimated dimensions rather than the actual sealed package.
- Comparing base transportation while ignoring the charges that appear later on the invoice.
- Using a single favorable shipment as a substitute for normal-volume history.
- Implementing every recommendation at once before cost and service are verified.
A durable comparison is built on documented shipment data, clear routing rules and scheduled review—not one carrier slogan.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, ShipForce or The Shipping Savers?
Neither option is automatically better for every shipper. Test ShipForce and The Shipping Savers with the same shipments, then compare total cost, workflow, support and the services the business actually uses.
How much shipment history should a business review?
Use enough history to capture repeat services, zones and cartons—typically four to eight weeks, plus a peak period when relevant.
Should the comparison use list rates or final charges?
Use the complete expected and invoiced charge in the comparison. Base transportation can hide fuel, residential, delivery-area, handling, correction and signature fees.
Can a lower rate create an operational problem?
Yes. A sound decision protects the required delivery experience and avoids shifting cost into packing labor, exceptions or reships.
What is the fastest way to start?
Export recent shipment data, gather two recent invoices and identify the five most common package profiles. The Shipping Savers can use that material to build a controlled review of ShipForce vs The Shipping Savers.
Compare your real shipments.
Start with real shipment history. The free review checks package inputs, service requirements and the charges most likely to recur.