- Evaluate the all-in expected charge, not the headline discount percentage.
- Keep the promised delivery outcome and shipment inputs consistent throughout the test.
- Build the review from normal-volume shipment data, not one unusually favorable package.
- Verify changes with a pilot and the final invoice.
Comparing Easyship and The Shipping Savers only works when the inputs match. The analysis should hold weight, dimensions, addresses, service commitment and residential status constant, then compare the complete result.
The Shipping Savers works at package level because averages conceal the cause of high spend. One shipper may have dimensional-weight exposure while another is paying for unnecessary air or repeated destination fees.
How to make a fair Easyship vs The Shipping Savers comparison
The test should cover domestic and international rate comparison, software and support. A single light package to one ZIP code cannot represent an entire shipping operation.
- Group the recurring origin-to-destination lanes so lane and zone effects are visible in the comparison.
- Check the measured package weight and carrier-billed weight for every package in the sample.
- Confirm the required delivery time and pickup cutoff before comparing prices.
- Separate signature, residential, remote-area and handling charges instead of hiding them inside an average.
- Track fuel, demand and invoice-adjustment fees when building the comparison baseline.
- The workflow and support differences that matter to the business after comparing Easyship and The Shipping Savers.
The comparison should not assume that Easyship and The Shipping Savers are interchangeable. Document the services, workflow steps and support requirements that matter, then price the same shipments. The result may differ by package size, destination, service and monthly volume.
If one option looks lower, inspect why. Confirm that the service commitment matches, that residential and delivery-area status are handled consistently, and that the number includes fees likely to appear on the invoice.
A controlled way to compare the options
Treat the comparison as a small project with a written sample, controlled inputs and an agreed success threshold.
- Use a cross-section of recent orders that covers common cartons, zones, services and both commercial and residential destinations.
- Keep addresses, measured package data and service requirement constant so the comparison is a fair test.
- Reconcile the transportation charge and every added line separately.
- Reject any apparent comparison savings that come only from accepting a weaker delivery commitment.
- Pilot the proposed comparison change on a defined shipment group, then reconcile the forecast with the final invoice.
A screen price is useful for planning, but the invoiced amount determines whether the recommendation actually worked.
Illustrative shipment review
Consider a business shipping about 450 packages per month. One representative package moves from San Diego, CA to Denver, CO, weighs 24 lb and measures 22 x 18 x 14 inches. The numbers below are only a teaching example, not a carrier quote.
| Cost component | Current example | Reviewed example |
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | $18.00 | $14.84 |
| Fuel and accessorials | $8.52 | $4.02 |
| Illustrative total | $26.52 | $19.36 |
The reviewed example could come from a better eligible rate, a smaller billed size, a different service that still meets the deadline, fewer accessorials or a combination of those changes. This step also makes internal conversations easier. Finance can see the complete cost, operations can see the process change, and customer service can confirm that the delivery promise remains intact.
Where a business should look for savings
Use identical inputs
Price the same packages in Easyship and The Shipping Savers with matching addresses, dimensions and service commitments.
Compare all-in cost
Include fuel, residential, delivery-area, handling and platform costs instead of recording only the first number shown.
Measure workflow
Record the time needed to import orders, correct addresses, choose services, print labels and resolve problems.
Pilot before moving volume
Test a representative group, verify invoices and keep a rollback plan before changing the full operation.
Keep the savings calculation auditable by reporting baseline cost, reviewed cost, shipment count and the period tested.
What to gather before requesting a review
Gathering the following fields turns the comparison from a general quote request into an auditable analysis:
- At least four representative weeks of shipment history.
- Origin and destination ZIP codes for every shipment.
- Carrier service, ship date and delivery commitment.
- Actual weight, package dimensions and billed weight.
- Transportation charge, fuel and every accessorial line.
- Destination type, delivery-area status and the number of packages in the shipment.
- Credits, adjustments, voids and claims where available.
- A set of identical test shipments priced in both Easyship and The Shipping Savers.
- A short record of workflow time, support needs and any additional platform cost.
A practical 30-day action plan
Export normal-volume shipments, attach the billed charges and organize the sample into repeatable profiles.
Sort the largest repeat charges by annual impact, then identify whether each one comes from rate, package or process.
Apply the recommendation to a controlled group and preserve the same practical delivery requirement.
Close the pilot by checking the bill and customer result, and turn the recommendation into a clear packing or routing instruction.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Treating a slower delivery commitment as if it were a like-for-like rate improvement.
- Relying on catalog specifications instead of measuring the packed carton.
- Leaving residential, delivery-area, handling or fuel lines out of the comparison.
- Drawing a broad conclusion from one lane, one carton or an unrepresentative month.
- Scaling a spreadsheet result before carrier billing and customer outcomes are checked.
A durable comparison is built on documented shipment data, clear routing rules and scheduled review—not one carrier slogan.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Easyship or The Shipping Savers?
Neither option is automatically better for every shipper. Test Easyship and The Shipping Savers with the same shipments, then compare total cost, workflow, support and the services the business actually uses.
How much shipment history should a business review?
Begin with roughly one to two months of normal activity. Seasonal businesses should add peak-period data so the result is not built around a quiet window.
Should the comparison use list rates or final charges?
The relevant number is all-in cost per shipment, including fuel and accessorials that repeatedly apply to the sample.
Can a lower rate create an operational problem?
Yes. Savings are not durable when they create missed promises, manual exceptions or damage. Verify the operational result alongside the invoice.
What is the fastest way to start?
Export recent shipment data, gather two recent invoices and identify the five most common package profiles. The Shipping Savers can use that material to build a controlled review of Easyship vs The Shipping Savers.
Compare your real shipments.
Start with real shipment history. The free review checks package inputs, service requirements and the charges most likely to recur.